<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Beta r385</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photostack.org/2005/11/05/beta-r385/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photostack.org/2005/11/05/beta-r385/</link>
	<description>Simplified Image Organization</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: noel</title>
		<link>http://photostack.org/2005/11/05/beta-r385/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>noel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 06:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photostack.org/2005/11/05/beta-r385/#comment-157</guid>
		<description>Fix is on the way for ImageMagick Problems, thanks for the help!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fix is on the way for ImageMagick Problems, thanks for the help!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Rove</title>
		<link>http://photostack.org/2005/11/05/beta-r385/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Rove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 04:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photostack.org/2005/11/05/beta-r385/#comment-156</guid>
		<description>In checking out this release, I was a bit disappointed with the muted colors that gd2 output in my scaled images, so I switched to ImageMagick. In doing so, however, the original images (8 megapixels!) were not scaled to the specified maximum width of 600 pixels; rather, the originals were output and scaled by the browsers to a maximum width of 600 (i.e. it still downloaded the 3.4 MB file, but the browser did the scaling).

In short, gd2 output a 600x400 image but ImageMagick output the original, huge image and did not scale it for browsing purposes.

As an aside, for those interested in comparing the output of Photoshop to gd2, take a look:
GD2 : http://www.sensoryoutput.com/photostack-dev/thumb.php?gallery=./Yard&#38;image=IMG_1186.jpg&#38;width=600&#38;height=600
Photoshop : http://www.sensoryoutput.com/photos/yard_2005_11/IMG_1186.jpg

The photoshop scaled image had an unsharp mask applied, thus removing the softening that usually accompanies such scaling operations.

BTW, what is the deal with the template.ini settings having "thumb" in front of options that really have nothing to do with thumbnails (i.e. the last set of options for images)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In checking out this release, I was a bit disappointed with the muted colors that gd2 output in my scaled images, so I switched to ImageMagick. In doing so, however, the original images (8 megapixels!) were not scaled to the specified maximum width of 600 pixels; rather, the originals were output and scaled by the browsers to a maximum width of 600 (i.e. it still downloaded the 3.4 MB file, but the browser did the scaling).</p>
<p>In short, gd2 output a 600&#215;400 image but ImageMagick output the original, huge image and did not scale it for browsing purposes.</p>
<p>As an aside, for those interested in comparing the output of Photoshop to gd2, take a look:<br />
GD2 : <a href="http://www.sensoryoutput.com/photostack-dev/thumb.php?gallery=./Yard&amp;image=IMG_1186.jpg&amp;width=600&amp;height=600" rel="nofollow">http://www.sensoryoutput.com/photostack-dev/thumb.php?gallery=./Yard&amp;image=IMG_1186.jpg&amp;width=600&amp;height=600</a><br />
Photoshop : <a href="http://www.sensoryoutput.com/photos/yard_2005_11/IMG_1186.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.sensoryoutput.com/photos/yard_2005_11/IMG_1186.jpg</a></p>
<p>The photoshop scaled image had an unsharp mask applied, thus removing the softening that usually accompanies such scaling operations.</p>
<p>BTW, what is the deal with the template.ini settings having &#8220;thumb&#8221; in front of options that really have nothing to do with thumbnails (i.e. the last set of options for images)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://photostack.org/2005/11/05/beta-r385/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2005 01:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photostack.org/2005/11/05/beta-r385/#comment-155</guid>
		<description>That is a nice theme</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a nice theme</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: romamor</title>
		<link>http://photostack.org/2005/11/05/beta-r385/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>romamor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photostack.org/2005/11/05/beta-r385/#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Noel, check this out for a great gallery theme:

http://www.contact-sheet.de/index.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noel, check this out for a great gallery theme:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.contact-sheet.de/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.contact-sheet.de/index.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://photostack.org/2005/11/05/beta-r385/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:03:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photostack.org/2005/11/05/beta-r385/#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Still suffering 'An error occurred: Could not upload file' on localhost (XAMPP) when uploading image, but AOK on remote.

Great work, Noel.  Hat's off to you! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still suffering &#8216;An error occurred: Could not upload file&#8217; on localhost (XAMPP) when uploading image, but AOK on remote.</p>
<p>Great work, Noel.  Hat&#8217;s off to you! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Rinehart-Balfe</title>
		<link>http://photostack.org/2005/11/05/beta-r385/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Rinehart-Balfe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 16:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photostack.org/2005/11/05/beta-r385/#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Cheers Noel, control panel works just fine now, lovin' this large and as happy as a pig in the proverbial.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers Noel, control panel works just fine now, lovin&#8217; this large and as happy as a pig in the proverbial&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brant</title>
		<link>http://photostack.org/2005/11/05/beta-r385/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>brant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 13:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photostack.org/2005/11/05/beta-r385/#comment-150</guid>
		<description>my last post got ruined - i basically took the php str_split function out of line 54 and 32, and changed the input type to password.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my last post got ruined - i basically took the php str_split function out of line 54 and 32, and changed the input type to password.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brant</title>
		<link>http://photostack.org/2005/11/05/beta-r385/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>brant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 13:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photostack.org/2005/11/05/beta-r385/#comment-149</guid>
		<description>I have replaced line 54 in manageusers.tpl.php and line 32 in editusers.tpl.php with:

Password

works fine now for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have replaced line 54 in manageusers.tpl.php and line 32 in editusers.tpl.php with:</p>
<p>Password</p>
<p>works fine now for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brant</title>
		<link>http://photostack.org/2005/11/05/beta-r385/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>brant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 13:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photostack.org/2005/11/05/beta-r385/#comment-148</guid>
		<description>here is a link to my &lt;a href="http://brantwinter.id.au/phpinfo.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;phpinfo.php file&lt;/a&gt;

is str_split() a PHP 5 only function ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here is a link to my <a href="http://brantwinter.id.au/phpinfo.php" rel="nofollow">phpinfo.php file</a></p>
<p>is str_split() a PHP 5 only function ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brant</title>
		<link>http://photostack.org/2005/11/05/beta-r385/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>brant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 12:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photostack.org/2005/11/05/beta-r385/#comment-147</guid>
		<description>gday - I get this error in organize.php when I attempt to edit a user:

Fatal error: Call to undefined function: str_split() in /home/xxx/public_html/templates/admin_default/edituser.tpl.php on line 32</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gday - I get this error in organize.php when I attempt to edit a user:</p>
<p>Fatal error: Call to undefined function: str_split() in /home/xxx/public_html/templates/admin_default/edituser.tpl.php on line 32</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
